Oakland gets the cultural spotlight, the sports nostalgia, and the media attention while Richmond — with its own rich history and community — stays in the shadows. Does Richmond need to stop comparing itself to Oakland and own its identity?
Join the debate to comment
Reading is free. Members pay to post — that's why it stays clean.
Add your commentBorn and raised in Richmond and I am SO tired of this. Every time I tell people where I'm from they go 'oh, like near Oakland?' NO. Richmond has its own story. Rosie the Riveter. The Ford Assembly Plant. The harbor. We literally helped win World War II and somehow that's a footnote compared to Oakland's everything. Own your identity, Richmond. Stop waiting for the Bay Area media to give you permission.
I'll say what nobody wants to say: Richmond's city government has spent 30 years failing to capitalize on genuine assets. The waterfront alone should be a destination. Instead we get another study, another committee, another plan that goes nowhere. Oakland isn't holding Richmond back. Richmond's own leadership is. Fight me.
My grandfather worked at the Kaiser Shipyards during the war. He used to say Richmond built the ships that saved the world and then got left to rust while everyone else took the credit. That was 1985 and honestly not a whole lot has changed in terms of how the rest of the Bay sees us. It gets old.
Moved here from Atlanta two years ago and honestly Richmond has more authentic character than half the 'cool' neighborhoods in Oakland that got gentrified into oblivion. The murals on Macdonald Ave, the Point Richmond historic district, the waterfront — this city has BONES. Y'all just keep underselling it.
Nope. Hard disagree with the whole premise. Comparing yourself to Oakland is exactly how you LOSE. Richmond should be looking at what Richmond wants to be, full stop. Who cares what Oakland gets? Different city, different history, different future. The inferiority complex is the only thing holding us back and every one of these 'Richmond vs Oakland' articles feeds it. Can we please just stop clicking on this stuff.
hot take but richmond isnt even trying to compete with oakland. thats a media narrative. talk to actual richmond people and nobody is sitting around jealous of Oakland lol. we got our own problems and our own pride and they aint the same thing
Okay but can we talk about how the Rosie the Riveter National Monument is literally IN RICHMOND and most Bay Area people have never even been there?? I asked my coworkers in SF if they'd visited and like two out of eight had. It's a federally recognized historic site and it gets treated like a trivia answer. That's the whole problem in one example.
Richmond was actually the first city in California to elect a Green Party mayor, which happened back in like 2008 or something, which proves the city has always been politically ahead of the curve compared to Oakland. Look it up people. [Editor's note for readers: This claim is inaccurate — Gayle McLaughlin was Richmond's Green Party mayor first elected in 2006, but the "first in California" framing is disputed. Oakland has also had progressive leadership histories worth acknowledging.]
Is it wrong to choose not to have children just because you don't want to?
110 comments
Would you still eat meat if you had to kill the animal yourself?
109 comments
Is judging someone by their height as shallow as judging by their weight?
108 comments
Are dating apps genuinely harder for men or for women?
108 comments